ghsa-jf9r-74qm-gqm9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:58
Modified
2022-04-29 02:58
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in the OJPEGVSetField function in tif_ojpeg.c for libtiff 3.6.1 and earlier, when compiled with the OJPEG_SUPPORT (old JPEG support) option, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed TIFF image.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0929"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-01-27T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the OJPEGVSetField function in tif_ojpeg.c for libtiff 3.6.1 and earlier, when compiled with the OJPEG_SUPPORT (old JPEG support) option, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed TIFF image.",
  "id": "GHSA-jf9r-74qm-gqm9",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:37Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:58:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0929"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17843"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=154\u0026type=vulnerabilities"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/129910"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2004_38_libtiff.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.