GHSA-JFCR-JPXH-MCQV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 19:57 – Updated: 2022-05-17 19:57
VLAI?
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the WritePSDImage function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.5.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large number of layers in a PSD image, involving the L%02ld string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2030.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-1947"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-02-17T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the WritePSDImage function in coders/psd.c in ImageMagick 6.5.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large number of layers in a PSD image, involving the L%02ld string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2030.",
"id": "GHSA-jfcr-jpxh-mcqv",
"modified": "2022-05-17T19:57:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T19:57:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-1947"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064098"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2014/suse-su-20140359-1.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/02/12/13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/02/12/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/02/13/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/02/13/5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/02/19/13"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…