ghsa-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q
Vulnerability from github
Summary
Log4j versions prior to 2.16.0 are subject to a remote code execution vulnerability via the ldap JNDI parser. As per Apache's Log4j security guide: Apache Log4j2 <=2.14.1 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.16.0, this behavior has been disabled by default.
Log4j version 2.15.0 contained an earlier fix for the vulnerability, but that patch did not disable attacker-controlled JNDI lookups in all situations. For more information, see the Updated advice for version 2.16.0
section of this advisory.
Impact
Logging untrusted or user controlled data with a vulnerable version of Log4J may result in Remote Code Execution (RCE) against your application. This includes untrusted data included in logged errors such as exception traces, authentication failures, and other unexpected vectors of user controlled input.
Affected versions
Any Log4J version prior to v2.15.0 is affected to this specific issue.
The v1 branch of Log4J which is considered End Of Life (EOL) is vulnerable to other RCE vectors so the recommendation is to still update to 2.16.0 where possible.
Security releases
Additional backports of this fix have been made available in versions 2.3.1, 2.12.2, and 2.12.3
Affected packages
Only the org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core
package is directly affected by this vulnerability. The org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api
should be kept at the same version as the org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core
package to ensure compatability if in use.
Remediation Advice
Updated advice for version 2.16.0
The Apache Logging Services team provided updated mitigation advice upon the release of version 2.16.0, which disables JNDI by default and completely removes support for message lookups. Even in version 2.15.0, lookups used in layouts to provide specific pieces of context information will still recursively resolve, possibly triggering JNDI lookups. This problem is being tracked as CVE-2021-45046. More information is available on the GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2021-45046.
Users who want to avoid attacker-controlled JNDI lookups but cannot upgrade to 2.16.0 must ensure that no such lookups resolve to attacker-provided data and ensure that the the JndiLookup class is not loaded.
Please note that Log4J v1 is End Of Life (EOL) and will not receive patches for this issue. Log4J v1 is also vulnerable to other RCE vectors and we recommend you migrate to Log4J 2.16.0 where possible.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.13.0" }, { "fixed": "2.15.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.0-beta9" }, { "fixed": "2.3.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "2.4" }, { "fixed": "2.12.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "com.guicedee.services:log4j-core" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "last_affected": "1.2.1.2-jre17" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.xbib.elasticsearch:log4j" }, "versions": [ "6.3.2.1" ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "uk.co.nichesolutions.logging.log4j:log4j-core" }, "versions": [ "2.6.3-CUSTOM" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-44228" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20", "CWE-400", "CWE-502", "CWE-917" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2021-12-10T00:40:41Z", "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-10T10:15:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "# Summary\n\nLog4j versions prior to 2.16.0 are subject to a remote code execution vulnerability via the ldap JNDI parser.\nAs per [Apache\u0027s Log4j security guide](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html): Apache Log4j2 \u003c=2.14.1 JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.16.0, this behavior has been disabled by default.\n\nLog4j version 2.15.0 contained an earlier fix for the vulnerability, but that patch did not disable attacker-controlled JNDI lookups in all situations. For more information, see the `Updated advice for version 2.16.0` section of this advisory.\n\n# Impact\n\nLogging untrusted or user controlled data with a vulnerable version of Log4J may result in Remote Code Execution (RCE) against your application. This includes untrusted data included in logged errors such as exception traces, authentication failures, and other unexpected vectors of user controlled input. \n\n# Affected versions\n\nAny Log4J version prior to v2.15.0 is affected to this specific issue.\n\nThe v1 branch of Log4J which is considered End Of Life (EOL) is vulnerable to other RCE vectors so the recommendation is to still update to 2.16.0 where possible.\n\n## Security releases\nAdditional backports of this fix have been made available in versions 2.3.1, 2.12.2, and 2.12.3\n\n## Affected packages\nOnly the `org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core` package is directly affected by this vulnerability. The `org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api` should be kept at the same version as the `org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core` package to ensure compatability if in use.\n\n# Remediation Advice\n\n## Updated advice for version 2.16.0\n\nThe Apache Logging Services team provided updated mitigation advice upon the release of version 2.16.0, which [disables JNDI by default and completely removes support for message lookups](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html#a2.16.0).\nEven in version 2.15.0, lookups used in layouts to provide specific pieces of context information will still recursively resolve, possibly triggering JNDI lookups. This problem is being tracked as [CVE-2021-45046](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-45046). More information is available on the [GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2021-45046](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rjr-3q55-vv33).\n\nUsers who want to avoid attacker-controlled JNDI lookups but cannot upgrade to 2.16.0 must [ensure that no such lookups resolve to attacker-provided data and ensure that the the JndiLookup class is not loaded](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3221).\n\nPlease note that Log4J v1 is End Of Life (EOL) and will not receive patches for this issue. Log4J v1 is also vulnerable to other RCE vectors and we recommend you migrate to Log4J 2.16.0 where possible.\n\n", "id": "GHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q", "modified": "2024-07-25T20:12:08Z", "published": "2021-12-10T00:40:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/608" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html#a2.15.0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/lookups.html#JndiLookup" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/migration.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2021/12/11/microsofts-response-to-cve-2021-44228-apache-log4j2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0032" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211210-0007" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213189" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-apache-log4j-qRuKNEbd" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://twitter.com/kurtseifried/status/1469345530182455296" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.bentley.com/en/common-vulnerability-exposure/be-2022-0001" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-5020" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00646.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/930724" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.nu11secur1ty.com/2021/12/cve-2021-44228.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/alert-cve-2021-44228.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-397453.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-479842.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-661247.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-714170.pdf" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7rjr-3q55-vv33" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cisagov/log4j-affected-db" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cisagov/log4j-affected-db/blob/develop/SOFTWARE-LIST.md" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/nu11secur1ty/CVE-mitre/tree/main/CVE-2021-44228" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/apache-log4j-poc" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3198" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3201" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3214" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3221" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/12/msg00007.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/M5CSVUNV4HWZZXGOKNSK6L7RPM7BOKIB" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VU57UJDCFIASIO35GC55JMKSRXJMCDFM" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/M5CSVUNV4HWZZXGOKNSK6L7RPM7BOKIB" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VU57UJDCFIASIO35GC55JMKSRXJMCDFM" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165225/Apache-Log4j2-2.14.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165260/VMware-Security-Advisory-2021-0028.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165261/Apache-Log4j2-2.14.1-Information-Disclosure.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165270/Apache-Log4j2-2.14.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165281/Log4j2-Log4Shell-Regexes.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165282/Log4j-Payload-Generator.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165306/L4sh-Log4j-Remote-Code-Execution.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165307/Log4j-Remote-Code-Execution-Word-Bypassing.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165311/log4j-scan-Extensive-Scanner.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165371/VMware-Security-Advisory-2021-0028.4.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165532/Log4Shell-HTTP-Header-Injection.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165642/VMware-vCenter-Server-Unauthenticated-Log4Shell-JNDI-Injection-Remote-Code-Execution.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165673/UniFi-Network-Application-Unauthenticated-Log4Shell-Remote-Code-Execution.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167794/Open-Xchange-App-Suite-7.10.x-Cross-Site-Scripting-Command-Injection.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167917/MobileIron-Log4Shell-Remote-Command-Execution.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171626/AD-Manager-Plus-7122-Remote-Code-Execution.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Jul/11" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/23" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/10/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/10/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/10/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/13/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/13/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/14/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/15/3" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Remote code injection in Log4j" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.