GHSA-JFJC-3X9J-QG99
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:25 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:25
VLAI?
Details
rx/rx.c in OpenAFS 1.5.75 through 1.5.78, 1.6.x before 1.6.15, and 1.7.x before 1.7.33 does not properly initialize padding at the end of an Rx acknowledgement (ACK) packet, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by (1) conducting a replay attack or (2) sniffing the network.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-7763"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-11-06T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "rx/rx.c in OpenAFS 1.5.75 through 1.5.78, 1.6.x before 1.6.15, and 1.7.x before 1.7.33 does not properly initialize padding at the end of an Rx acknowledgement (ACK) packet, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by (1) conducting a replay attack or (2) sniffing the network.",
"id": "GHSA-jfjc-3x9j-qg99",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:25:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:25:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7763"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-announce/2015/000493.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.6.15/RELNOTES-1.6.15"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openafs.org/pages/security/OPENAFS-SA-2015-007.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3387"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034039"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…