ghsa-jfjc-3x9j-qg99
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:25
Modified
2022-05-17 03:25
Details
rx/rx.c in OpenAFS 1.5.75 through 1.5.78, 1.6.x before 1.6.15, and 1.7.x before 1.7.33 does not properly initialize padding at the end of an Rx acknowledgement (ACK) packet, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by (1) conducting a replay attack or (2) sniffing the network.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-7763" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-11-06T21:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "rx/rx.c in OpenAFS 1.5.75 through 1.5.78, 1.6.x before 1.6.15, and 1.7.x before 1.7.33 does not properly initialize padding at the end of an Rx acknowledgement (ACK) packet, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by (1) conducting a replay attack or (2) sniffing the network.", "id": "GHSA-jfjc-3x9j-qg99", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:25:31Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:25:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7763" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-announce/2015/000493.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.6.15/RELNOTES-1.6.15" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openafs.org/pages/security/OPENAFS-SA-2015-007.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3387" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034039" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.