GHSA-JG6C-X8JV-83XC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:48 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:48
VLAI?
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) before 2.3(4.7) and 3.x before 3.1(3.1) causes the access control entries (ACE) in an ACL to be improperly evaluated, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended certain ACL protections.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-0968"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-02-16T00:28:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) before 2.3(4.7) and 3.x before 3.1(3.1) causes the access control entries (ACE) in an ACL to be improperly evaluated, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended certain ACL protections.",
"id": "GHSA-jg6c-x8jv-83xc",
"modified": "2022-05-01T17:48:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T17:48:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-0968"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32521"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24172"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a00807e2481.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22561"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017650"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0609"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…