GHSA-JGCX-M8RV-926P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:08 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:08
VLAI?
Details
Papyrus NASCAR Racing 4 4.1.3.1.6 and earlier, 2002 Season 1.1.0.2 and earlier, and 2003 Season 1.2.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending an empty UDP datagram, which is not properly discarded due to use of the FIONREAD asynchronous socket.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-3393"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-07-06T20:05:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Papyrus NASCAR Racing 4 4.1.3.1.6 and earlier, 2002 Season 1.1.0.2 and earlier, and 2003 Season 1.2.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending an empty UDP datagram, which is not properly discarded due to use of the FIONREAD asynchronous socket.",
"id": "GHSA-jgcx-m8rv-926p",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:08:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:08:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-3393"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27522"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/nascarzero-adv.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20947"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18778"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2647"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…