GHSA-JP54-XJFC-9FQX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-21 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix potential deadlock in mt7925_roc_abort_sync

roc_abort_sync() can deadlock with roc_work(). roc_work() holds dev->mt76.mutex, while cancel_work_sync() waits for roc_work() to finish. If the caller already owns the same mutex, both sides block and no progress is possible.

This deadlock can occur during station removal when mt76_sta_state() -> mt76_sta_remove() -> mt7925_mac_sta_remove_link() -> mt7925_mac_link_sta_remove() -> mt7925_roc_abort_sync() invokes cancel_work_sync() while roc_work() is still running and holding dev->mt76.mutex.

This avoids the mutex deadlock and preserves exactly-once work ownership.

Severity
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53103"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: mt76: mt7925: fix potential deadlock in mt7925_roc_abort_sync\n\nroc_abort_sync() can deadlock with roc_work(). roc_work() holds\ndev-\u003emt76.mutex, while cancel_work_sync() waits for roc_work()\nto finish. If the caller already owns the same mutex, both\nsides block and no progress is possible.\n\nThis deadlock can occur during station removal when\nmt76_sta_state() -\u003e mt76_sta_remove() -\u003e\nmt7925_mac_sta_remove_link() -\u003e mt7925_mac_link_sta_remove() -\u003e\nmt7925_roc_abort_sync() invokes cancel_work_sync() while\nroc_work() is still running and holding dev-\u003emt76.mutex.\n\nThis avoids the mutex deadlock and preserves exactly-once\nwork ownership.",
  "id": "GHSA-jp54-xjfc-9fqx",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T18:30:44Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53103"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/153bcba36c87a1ba555b57b6c49028d5812f895b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d8e0053bca29143ace51e08c980ff076844a4b0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd08ca3f092f4185ece69ce2a835c23198b1628a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.