ghsa-jq5h-388q-3jvj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-04 00:27
Modified
2022-05-04 00:27
Details
The em_syscall function in arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c in the KVM implementation in the Linux kernel before 3.2.14 does not properly handle the 0f05 (aka syscall) opcode, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) via a crafted application, as demonstrated by an NASM file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-0045" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-07-03T16:40:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The em_syscall function in arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c in the KVM implementation in the Linux kernel before 3.2.14 does not properly handle the 0f05 (aka syscall) opcode, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) via a crafted application, as demonstrated by an NASM file.", "id": "GHSA-jq5h-388q-3jvj", "modified": "2022-05-04T00:27:48Z", "published": "2022-05-04T00:27:48Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0045" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/c2226fc9e87ba3da060e47333657cd6616652b84" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773370" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c2226fc9e87ba3da060e47333657cd6616652b84" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c2226fc9e87ba3da060e47333657cd6616652b84" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00013.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.2.14" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/12/2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.