GHSA-JQWH-9M3G-V933
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-27 21:32 – Updated: 2025-02-28 18:31
VLAI?
Details
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Vigor2620/LTE200 3.9.8.9 and earlier and Vigor2860/2925 3.9.8 and earlier and Vigor2862/2926 3.9.9.5 and earlier and Vigor2133/2762/2832 3.9.9 and earlier and Vigor165/166 4.2.7 and earlier and Vigor2135/2765/2766 4.4.5.1 and earlier and Vigor2865/2866/2927 4.4.5.3 and earlier and Vigor2962/3910 4.3.2.8/4.4.3.1 and earlier and Vigor3912 4.3.6.1 and earlier allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the CGI parser's handling of the "Content-Length" header of HTTP POST requests.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-51139"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-120"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-27T21:15:37Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Vigor2620/LTE200 3.9.8.9 and earlier and Vigor2860/2925 3.9.8 and earlier and Vigor2862/2926 3.9.9.5 and earlier and Vigor2133/2762/2832 3.9.9 and earlier and Vigor165/166 4.2.7 and earlier and Vigor2135/2765/2766 4.4.5.1 and earlier and Vigor2865/2866/2927 4.4.5.3 and earlier and Vigor2962/3910 4.3.2.8/4.4.3.1 and earlier and Vigor3912 4.3.6.1 and earlier allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the CGI parser\u0027s handling of the \"Content-Length\" header of HTTP POST requests.",
"id": "GHSA-jqwh-9m3g-v933",
"modified": "2025-02-28T18:31:01Z",
"published": "2025-02-27T21:32:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-51139"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://medium.com/faraday/advisory-multiple-vulnerabilities-affecting-draytek-routers-78a6cb8b3946"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://draytek.com"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…