GHSA-JV8R-HV7Q-P6VC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-29 22:12 – Updated: 2025-12-31 22:13
VLAI
Summary
phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in user list via admin-managed display_name
Details

Summary

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an administrator’s browser by registering a user whose display name contains HTML entities (e.g., <img ...>). When an administrator views the admin user list, the payload is decoded server-side and rendered without escaping, resulting in script execution in the admin context.

Details

Root cause is the following chain: - User-controlled input stored: attacker-provided display_name (real name) is stored in DB (often as HTML entities, e.g., <img ...>). - Decode on read: phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/User/UserData.php decodes display_name using html_entity_decode(...) (“for backward compatibility”). - Unsafe sink: admin user list renders the decoded value unescaped using Twig |raw: - phpmyfaq/assets/templates/admin/user/users.twig (users table uses {{ user.display_name|raw }})

As a result, an entity-encoded payload becomes active HTML/JS when rendered in the admin user list.

Note: This report is about the display_name field + entity-decoding path. It is distinct from previously published issues focused on the email field.

PoC (minimal reproduction)

Preconditions / configuration - Registration enabled (security.enableRegistration = true). - Attacker does not need admin privileges. - Admin must view the admin user list page.

Steps 1. As an unauthenticated user, open the registration page and create a new account. 2. Set the display name / real name field to the following entity-encoded payload: - &lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&gt; 3. Complete registration. 4. As an administrator, open the admin user list (example): - http://127.0.0.1:8080/admin/user/list 5. Observe JavaScript execution in the admin’s browser (e.g., alert(1) triggers) and the payload is rendered as an actual <img> element.

Impact

Stored XSS in the admin context can enable: - admin session compromise (depending on cookie flags), - CSRF token exfiltration and privileged admin actions, - UI redress/phishing within the admin panel.

Evidence (what I observed)

  • Stored DB value (entities): &lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&gt;
  • Rendered HTML in admin user list: <img src="x" onerror="alert(1)">

Affected versions

Confirmed by code inspection - 4.0.14 - 4.0.15 - Both contain html_entity_decode for display_name in UserData.php and {{ user.display_name|raw }} in users.twig.

Confirmed by live reproduction - 4.1.0-RC (tested on current source checkout)

Environment (tested)

  • Host OS: macOS 15.6.1 (24G90)
  • Web container OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
  • PHP: 8.4.5RC1
  • DB: MariaDB 11.6.2
  • phpMyFAQ source commit (tested): bca1c4192c2ad61a3595b4289d9551a51e0e9848

Contact / Credit

  • Contact: jeongwoolee340@gmail.com
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "thorsten/phpmyfaq"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.14"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.0.16"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-68951"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-29T22:12:35Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-29T16:15:43Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an administrator\u2019s browser by registering a user whose **display name** contains HTML entities (e.g., `\u0026lt;img ...\u0026gt;`). When an administrator views the admin user list, the payload is decoded server-side and rendered without escaping, resulting in script execution in the admin context.\n\n### Details\nRoot cause is the following chain:\n- **User-controlled input stored**: attacker-provided `display_name` (real name) is stored in DB (often as HTML entities, e.g., `\u0026lt;img ...\u0026gt;`).\n- **Decode on read**: `phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/User/UserData.php` decodes `display_name` using `html_entity_decode(...)` (\u201cfor backward compatibility\u201d).\n- **Unsafe sink**: admin user list renders the decoded value unescaped using Twig `|raw`:\n  - `phpmyfaq/assets/templates/admin/user/users.twig` (users table uses `{{ user.display_name|raw }}`)\n\nAs a result, an entity-encoded payload becomes active HTML/JS when rendered in the admin user list.\n\nNote: This report is about the `display_name` field + entity-decoding path. It is distinct from previously published issues focused on the `email` field.\n\n### PoC (minimal reproduction)\n**Preconditions / configuration**\n- Registration enabled (`security.enableRegistration = true`).\n- Attacker does not need admin privileges.\n- Admin must view the admin user list page.\n\n**Steps**\n1. As an unauthenticated user, open the registration page and create a new account.\n2. Set the **display name / real name** field to the following entity-encoded payload:\n   - `\u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt;`\n3. Complete registration.\n4. As an administrator, open the admin user list (example):\n   - `http://127.0.0.1:8080/admin/user/list`\n5. Observe JavaScript execution in the admin\u2019s browser (e.g., `alert(1)` triggers) and the payload is rendered as an actual `\u003cimg\u003e` element.\n\n### Impact\nStored XSS in the admin context can enable:\n- admin session compromise (depending on cookie flags),\n- CSRF token exfiltration and privileged admin actions,\n- UI redress/phishing within the admin panel.\n\n### Evidence (what I observed)\n- Stored DB value (entities):\n  `\u0026lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)\u0026gt;`\n- Rendered HTML in admin user list:\n  `\u003cimg src=\"x\" onerror=\"alert(1)\"\u003e`\n\n### Affected versions\n**Confirmed by code inspection**\n- 4.0.14\n- 4.0.15\n  - Both contain `html_entity_decode` for `display_name` in `UserData.php` and `{{ user.display_name|raw }}` in `users.twig`.\n\n**Confirmed by live reproduction**\n- 4.1.0-RC (tested on current source checkout)\n\n### Environment (tested)\n- Host OS: macOS 15.6.1 (24G90)\n- Web container OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)\n- PHP: 8.4.5RC1\n- DB: MariaDB 11.6.2\n- phpMyFAQ source commit (tested): bca1c4192c2ad61a3595b4289d9551a51e0e9848\n\n### Contact / Credit\n- Contact: jeongwoolee340@gmail.com",
  "id": "GHSA-jv8r-hv7q-p6vc",
  "modified": "2025-12-31T22:13:13Z",
  "published": "2025-12-29T22:12:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-jv8r-hv7q-p6vc"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68951"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/61829e83411f7b28bc6fd1052bfde54c32c6c370"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/8211d1d25951b4c272443cfc3ef9c09b1363fd87"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in user list via admin-managed display_name"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…