ghsa-jvm5-r77x-76rj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:11
Modified
2022-05-01 07:11
Details
Integer overflow in Microsoft Word 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004 for Mac, and v.X for Mac allows remote user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string in a Word document, which overflows a 16-bit integer length value, aka "Memmove Code Execution," a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-3651 and CVE-2006-4693.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-3647"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-10-10T22:07:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in Microsoft Word 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004 for Mac, and v.X for Mac allows remote user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string in a Word document, which overflows a 16-bit integer length value, aka \"Memmove Code Execution,\" a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-3651 and CVE-2006-4693.",
"id": "GHSA-jvm5-r77x-76rj",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:11:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:11:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-3647"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2006/ms06-060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2006-10/0211.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/29440"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/448417/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/449179/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20341"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3979"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.