ghsa-jw33-72hm-ggg2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-11-03 12:00
Modified
2022-11-04 19:01
Severity ?
Details
In libpixman in Pixman before 0.42.2, there is an out-of-bounds write (aka heap-based buffer overflow) in rasterize_edges_8 due to an integer overflow in pixman_sample_floor_y.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-44638" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-11-03T06:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In libpixman in Pixman before 0.42.2, there is an out-of-bounds write (aka heap-based buffer overflow) in rasterize_edges_8 due to an integer overflow in pixman_sample_floor_y.", "id": "GHSA-jw33-72hm-ggg2", "modified": "2022-11-04T19:01:10Z", "published": "2022-11-03T12:00:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-44638" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pixman/pixman/-/issues/63" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/11/msg00008.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AJ5VY2VYXE4WTRGQ6LMGLF6FV3SY37YE" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BY4OPSIB33ETNUXZY2UPZ4NGQ3OKDY4D" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IUJ2BULJTZ2BMSKQHB6US674P55UCWWS" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5276" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/170121/pixman-pixman_sample_floor_y-Integer-Overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/05/1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.