Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-JW9P-3GC4-84RW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-03 15:30 – Updated: 2024-09-05 15:33

Details

Host name validation for TLS certificates is bypassed when the installed OpenEdge default certificates are used to perform the TLS handshake for a networked connection. This has been corrected so that default certificates are no longer capable of overriding host name validation and will need to be replaced where full TLS certificate validation is needed for network security. The existing certificates should be replaced with CA-signed certificates from a recognized certificate authority that contain the necessary information to support host name validation.

Severity

7.2 (High)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-7346"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-297"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-09-03T15:15:16Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Host name validation for TLS certificates is bypassed when the installed OpenEdge default certificates are used to perform the TLS handshake for a networked connection.\u00a0 This has been corrected so that default certificates are no longer capable of overriding host name validation and will need to be replaced where full TLS certificate validation is needed for network security.\u00a0 The existing certificates should be replaced with CA-signed certificates from a recognized certificate authority that contain the necessary information to support host name validation.",
  "id": "GHSA-jw9p-3gc4-84rw",
  "modified": "2024-09-05T15:33:34Z",
  "published": "2024-09-03T15:30:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-7346"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://community.progress.com/s/article/Client-connections-using-default-TLS-certificates-from-OpenEdge-may-bypass-TLS-host-name-validation"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

CVE-2024-7346 (GCVE-0-2024-7346)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-09-03 14:51 – Updated: 2024-09-03 15:06

Title

Client connections using default TLS certificates from OpenEdge may bypass TLS host name validation

Summary

Severity

7.2 (High)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2024-09-03 15:03 UTC

CWE

CWE-297 - Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch

Assigner

ProgressSoftware mitre root

References

1 reference

URL	Tags
https://community.progress.com/s/article/Client-c…	vendor-advisory

Impacted products

2 products

Vendor	Product	Version
Progress	OpenEdge	Affected: 11.7.0 , ≤ 11.7.19 (custom) Affected: 12.2.0 , ≤ 12.2.14 (custom) Unaffected: 12.8.0 (custom)
progress	openedge	Affected: 11.7.0 , ≤ 11.7.19 (custom) Affected: 12.2.0 , ≤ 12.2.14 (custom) Unaffected: 12.8.0 cpe:2.3:a:progress:openedge::::::::

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:progress:openedge:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "affected",
            "product": "openedge",
            "vendor": "progress",
            "versions": [
              {
                "lessThanOrEqual": "11.7.19",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "11.7.0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              },
              {
                "lessThanOrEqual": "12.2.14",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "12.2.0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              },
              {
                "status": "unaffected",
                "version": "12.8.0"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-7346",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-09-03T15:03:24.623163Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T15:06:04.578Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "modules": [
            "PASOE Application Server",
            "OpenEdge Authentication Gateway"
          ],
          "platforms": [
            "Windows",
            "Linux",
            "64 bit",
            "x86",
            "32 bit"
          ],
          "product": "OpenEdge",
          "vendor": "Progress",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "11.7.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "11.7.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "12.2.14",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "12.2.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "12.8.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Use of the legacy OpenEdge default TLS/SSL certificates in TLS-networked connections in an OpenEdge installation.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Use of the legacy OpenEdge default TLS/SSL certificates in TLS-networked connections in an OpenEdge installation."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Host name validation for TLS certificates is bypassed when the installed OpenEdge default certificates are used to perform the TLS handshake for a networked connection.\u0026nbsp; This has been corrected so that default certificates are no longer capable of overriding host name validation and will need to be replaced where full TLS certificate validation is needed for network security.\u0026nbsp; The existing certificates should be replaced with CA-signed certificates from a recognized certificate authority that contain the necessary information to support host name validation.\u0026nbsp; \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Host name validation for TLS certificates is bypassed when the installed OpenEdge default certificates are used to perform the TLS handshake for a networked connection.\u00a0 This has been corrected so that default certificates are no longer capable of overriding host name validation and will need to be replaced where full TLS certificate validation is needed for network security.\u00a0 The existing certificates should be replaced with CA-signed certificates from a recognized certificate authority that contain the necessary information to support host name validation."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-272",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-272: Protocol Manipulation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.2,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-297",
              "description": "CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T14:51:03.551Z",
        "orgId": "f9fea0b6-671e-4eea-8fde-31911902ae05",
        "shortName": "ProgressSoftware"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://community.progress.com/s/article/Client-connections-using-default-TLS-certificates-from-OpenEdge-may-bypass-TLS-host-name-validation"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Use the 12.8.0 or above LTS release where the vulnerability does not exist\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Use the 12.8.0 or above LTS release where the vulnerability does not exist"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Use the 12.2 LTS release at the 12.2.15 Update level or above\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Use the 12.2 LTS release at the 12.2.15 Update level or above"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Use the 11.7 LTS release at the 11.7.20 Update level or above\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Use the 11.7 LTS release at the 11.7.20 Update level or above"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Client connections using default TLS certificates from OpenEdge may bypass TLS host name validation",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cdiv\u003eReplace all use of default OpenEdge TLS certificates with a CA-signed certificate from a recognized certificate authority that contains the necessary information to support host name validation\n\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Replace all use of default OpenEdge TLS certificates with a CA-signed certificate from a recognized certificate authority that contains the necessary information to support host name validation"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Use the \"nohostverify\" switch in development environments when clients need to bypass host name validation as a convenience prior to establishing valid certificates for production.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Use the \"nohostverify\" switch in development environments when clients need to bypass host name validation as a convenience prior to establishing valid certificates for production."
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f9fea0b6-671e-4eea-8fde-31911902ae05",
    "assignerShortName": "ProgressSoftware",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-7346",
    "datePublished": "2024-09-03T14:51:03.551Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-07-31T17:32:10.370Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-03T15:06:04.578Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.