GHSA-JX3W-WW7J-892Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-15 15:31 – Updated: 2025-12-03 21:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/mdp5: Add check for kzalloc
As kzalloc may fail and return NULL pointer, it should be better to check the return value in order to avoid the NULL pointer dereference.
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/514154/
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-53239"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-15T15:15:51Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/msm/mdp5: Add check for kzalloc\n\nAs kzalloc may fail and return NULL pointer,\nit should be better to check the return value\nin order to avoid the NULL pointer dereference.\n\nPatchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/514154/",
"id": "GHSA-jx3w-ww7j-892q",
"modified": "2025-12-03T21:31:00Z",
"published": "2025-09-15T15:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53239"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13fcfcb2a9a4787fe4e49841d728f6f2e9fa6911"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37ff771ed008b9cbffd0eab77985968364694ce3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3975ea6eaffe26aec634b5c473e51dc76e73af62"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49907c8873826ee771ba0ca1629e809c6479f617"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82943a0730e00c14b03e25a4b2a1a9477ae89d7b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc579a2ee8b2e20c152b24b437d094832d8c9c9e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…