GHSA-JX47-VCQG-X34G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:58 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:58
VLAI?
Details

Cisco Secure Access Control Server for Windows (ACS Windows) and Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine (ACS Solution Engine) 3.3.1, when the EAP-TLS protocol is enabled, does not properly handle expired or untrusted certificates, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access via a "cryptographically correct" certificate with valid fields such as the username.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-1099"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-01-10T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Secure Access Control Server for Windows (ACS Windows) and Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine (ACS Solution Engine) 3.3.1, when the EAP-TLS protocol is enabled, does not properly handle expired or untrusted certificates, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access via a \"cryptographically correct\" certificate with valid fields such as the username.",
  "id": "GHSA-jx47-vcqg-x34g",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:57Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:58:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1099"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17936"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/p-028.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20041102-acs-eap-tls.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11577"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…