GHSA-JX75-HX64-35MH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:57 – Updated: 2025-04-03 03:59
VLAI?
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in the Socks-5 proxy code for XChat 1.8.0 to 2.0.8, with socks5 traversal enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0409"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-06-01T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the Socks-5 proxy code for XChat 1.8.0 to 2.0.8, with socks5 traversal enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.",
  "id": "GHSA-jx75-hx64-35mh",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T03:59:33Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0409"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11312"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-493"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://mail.nl.linux.org/xchat-announce/2004-04/msg00000.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200404-15.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.fedoralegacy.org/updates/FC2/2005-11-14-FLSA_2005_123013"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-177.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-585.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.xchat.org"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…