ghsa-jx75-hx64-35mh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:57
Modified
2022-04-29 02:57
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in the Socks-5 proxy code for XChat 1.8.0 to 2.0.8, with socks5 traversal enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0409"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-06-01T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the Socks-5 proxy code for XChat 1.8.0 to 2.0.8, with socks5 traversal enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.",
  "id": "GHSA-jx75-hx64-35mh",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:57:41Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:57:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0409"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11312"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-493"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://mail.nl.linux.org/xchat-announce/2004-04/msg00000.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200404-15.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.fedoralegacy.org/updates/FC2/2005-11-14-FLSA_2005_123013"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-177.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-585.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.xchat.org"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.