ghsa-m2ph-27r6-5vhw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-05 02:48
Modified
2022-05-05 02:48
Details

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Taxonomy Manager (taxonomy_manager) module 6.x-2.x before 6.x-2.2 and 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.0-rc1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users with 'administer taxonomy' permissions via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-0320"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-03-27T21:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Taxonomy Manager (taxonomy_manager) module 6.x-2.x before 6.x-2.2 and 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.0-rc1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users with \u0027administer taxonomy\u0027 permissions via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-m2ph-27r6-5vhw",
  "modified": "2022-05-05T02:48:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-05T02:48:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0320"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1922168"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1922170"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupal.org/node/1922410"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupalcode.org/project/taxonomy_manager.git/commitdiff/2d05801"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://drupalcode.org/project/taxonomy_manager.git/commitdiff/595f1b3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/21/5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.