ghsa-m332-53r6-2w93
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-10-06 23:03
Modified
2022-10-06 23:03
Summary
etcd's WAL `ReadAll` method vulnerable to an entry with large index causing panic
Details

Vulnerability type

Data Validation

Detail

In the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.

References

Find out more on this vulnerability in the security audit report

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Contact the etcd security committee

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "go.etcd.io/etcd/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.23"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "go.etcd.io/etcd/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.4.10"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-15112"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-129",
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-06T23:03:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-08-05T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Vulnerability type\nData Validation\n\n### Detail\nIn the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.\n\n### References\nFind out more on this vulnerability in the [security audit report](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf)\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Contact the [etcd security committee](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/security-release-process.md)",
  "id": "GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93",
  "modified": "2022-10-06T23:03:57Z",
  "published": "2022-10-06T23:03:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15112"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/11793"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/7d1cf640497cbcdfb932e619b13624112c7e3865"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/f4b650b51dc4a53a8700700dc12e1242ac56ba07"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2020-0005"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "etcd\u0027s WAL `ReadAll`  method vulnerable to an entry with large index causing panic"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.