ghsa-m36h-392c-pfv3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:51
Modified
2022-05-14 01:51
Details

The index server (hdbindexserver) in SAP HANA 1.00.095 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via an HTTP request, aka SAP Security Note 2197428.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-7986"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-10-27T16:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The index server (hdbindexserver) in SAP HANA 1.00.095 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via an HTTP request, aka SAP Security Note 2197428.",
  "id": "GHSA-m36h-392c-pfv3",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T01:51:03Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:51:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7986"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://erpscan.io/advisories/erpscan-15-024-sap-hana-hdbindexserver-memory-corruption"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39382"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/135416/SAP-HANA-hdbindexserver-Memory-Corruption.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://scn.sap.com/community/security/blog/2015/10/14/sap-security-notes-october-2015--review"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Jan/94"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/537376/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.