ghsa-m3wx-vp3h-cjgc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 06:18
Modified
2022-05-02 06:18
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in a certain Tetradyne ActiveX control in HP Operations Manager 7.5, 8.10, and 8.16 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string argument to the (1) LoadFile or (2) SaveFile method, related to srcvw32.dll and srcvw4.dll.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-1033" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-04-21T14:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in a certain Tetradyne ActiveX control in HP Operations Manager 7.5, 8.10, and 8.16 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string argument to the (1) LoadFile or (2) SaveFile method, related to srcvw32.dll and srcvw4.dll.", "id": "GHSA-m3wx-vp3h-cjgc", "modified": "2022-05-02T06:18:18Z", "published": "2022-05-02T06:18:18Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1033" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/57938" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02078800" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://net-ninja.net/blog/media/blogs/b/exploits/hpoperationsmngr.html.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39538" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023894" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/advisories.php?id=CORELAN-10-027" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/wp-content/forum-file-uploads/mr_me/hpoperationsmngr.html.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39578" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0946" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.