GHSA-M44Q-PCG2-44FV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:15 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:15
VLAI?
Details
Persistent Accelerite Radia Client Automation (formerly HP Client Automation) 7.9 through 9.1 before 2015-02-19 improperly implements the Role Based Access Control feature, which might allow remote attackers to modify an account's role assignments via unspecified vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-7862"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-10-19T18:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Persistent Accelerite Radia Client Automation (formerly HP Client Automation) 7.9 through 9.1 before 2015-02-19 improperly implements the Role Based Access Control feature, which might allow remote attackers to modify an account\u0027s role assignments via unspecified vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-m44q-pcg2-44fv",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:15:21Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:15:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7862"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.accelerite.com/hc/en-us/articles/203659814-Accelerite-releases-solutions-and-best-practices-to-enhance-the-security-for-RBAC-and-Remote-Notify-features"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033862"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…