ghsa-m48m-qqmr-226c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:27
Modified
2022-04-29 01:27
Details
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the admin CGI script for Mailman before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to steal session cookies and conduct unauthorized activities.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2003-0965", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2004-02-17T05:00:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the admin CGI script for Mailman before 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to steal session cookies and conduct unauthorized activities.", id: "GHSA-m48m-qqmr-226c", modified: "2022-04-29T01:27:16Z", published: "2022-04-29T01:27:16Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0965", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/14121", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A813", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000842", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-announce/2003-December/000066.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/10519", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-436", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:013", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.osvdb.org/3305", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-020.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9336", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.