ghsa-m4pp-9j7g-g832
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:26
Modified
2022-04-29 01:26
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in Samba before 2.2.8a may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service, as discovered by the Samba team and a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0201.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-0196"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-05-05T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in Samba before 2.2.8a may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service, as discovered by the Samba team and a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0201.",
  "id": "GHSA-m4pp-9j7g-g832",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:26:00Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:26:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0196"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104973186901597\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104974612519064\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-280"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2003:044"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-137.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.