ghsa-m5h6-g75q-rpq4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:36
Modified
2022-05-01 23:36
Details

Buffer overflow in msjet40.dll before 4.0.9505.0 in Microsoft Jet Database Engine allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Word file, as exploited in the wild in March 2008. NOTE: as of 20080513, Microsoft has stated that this is the same issue as CVE-2007-6026.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-1092"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-03-25T16:44:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in msjet40.dll before 4.0.9505.0 in Microsoft Jet Database Engine allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Word file, as exploited in the wild in March 2008.  NOTE: as of 20080513, Microsoft has stated that this is the same issue as CVE-2007-6026.",
  "id": "GHSA-m5h6-g75q-rpq4",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T23:36:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:36:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1092"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2008/ms08-028"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41380"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=121129490723574\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/936529"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/950627.mspx"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019686"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.