GHSA-M5M3-46GJ-WCH8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-06 19:54 – Updated: 2023-01-10 16:09
VLAI?
Summary
SIF's Digital Signature Hash Algorithms Not Validated
Details

Impact

The github.com/sylabs/sif/v2/pkg/integrity package does not verify that the hash algorithm(s) used are cryptographically secure when verifying digital signatures.

Patches

A patch is available in version >= v2.8.1 of the module. Users are encouraged to upgrade.

The patch is commit https://github.com/sylabs/sif/commit/07fb86029a12e3210f6131e065570124605daeaa

Workarounds

Users may independently validate that the hash algorithm(s) used for metadata digest(s) and signature hash are cryptographically secure.

References

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Severity ?
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/sylabs/sif/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.8.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-39237"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-327",
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-06T19:54:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-10-06T18:16:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nThe `github.com/sylabs/sif/v2/pkg/integrity` package does not verify that the hash algorithm(s) used are cryptographically secure when verifying digital signatures.\n\n### Patches\n\nA patch is available in version \u003e= v2.8.1 of the module. Users are encouraged to upgrade.\n\nThe patch is commit https://github.com/sylabs/sif/commit/07fb86029a12e3210f6131e065570124605daeaa\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers may independently validate that the hash algorithm(s) used for metadata digest(s) and signature hash are cryptographically secure.\n\n### References\n\n* [CVE-2004-2761](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2004-2761)\n* [CVE-2005-4900](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2005-4900)\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open an issue in [github.com/sylabs/sif](https://github.com/sylabs/sif/issues/new)\n* Email us at [security@sylabs.io](mailto:security@sylabs.io)",
  "id": "GHSA-m5m3-46gj-wch8",
  "modified": "2023-01-10T16:09:12Z",
  "published": "2022-10-06T19:54:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif/security/advisories/GHSA-m5m3-46gj-wch8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif/commit/07fb86029a12e3210f6131e065570124605daeaa"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sylabs/sif/releases/tag/v2.8.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2004-2761"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2005-4900"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-1045"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-19"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "SIF\u0027s Digital Signature Hash Algorithms Not Validated"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.