GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-M5RQ-H5XV-G5G9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

i2c: imx: fix locked bus on SMBus block-read of 0 (IRQ)

SMBus 3.1 6.5.7 allows a Block Read byte count of 0, but the interrupt-driven block-read state machine rejects it as -EPROTO. Worse, it returns without a NACK+STOP: the next receive cycle has already started, so the target keeps holding SDA and the bus stays stuck until a power cycle of this i2c controller.

Accept count=0: NACK the in-flight dummy byte (TXAK) and set msg->len to 2 so i2c_imx_isr_read_continue() emits STOP via its normal last-byte path. The dummy byte is discarded; block-read callers only consume buf[0..count-1].

Reading I2DR has likewise already armed the next byte on the count > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX error path, so NACK it (TXAK) before aborting with -EPROTO; otherwise the failing transfer's STOP cannot complete and the bus stays held.

The atomic path regressed earlier (v3.16) and is fixed separately; this patch covers only the v6.13 state-machine rework.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72141"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:31Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni2c: imx: fix locked bus on SMBus block-read of 0 (IRQ)\n\nSMBus 3.1 6.5.7 allows a Block Read byte count of 0, but the\ninterrupt-driven block-read state machine rejects it as -EPROTO. Worse,\nit returns without a NACK+STOP: the next receive cycle has already\nstarted, so the target keeps holding SDA and the bus stays stuck until a\npower cycle of this i2c controller.\n\nAccept count=0: NACK the in-flight dummy byte (TXAK) and set msg-\u003elen to\n2 so i2c_imx_isr_read_continue() emits STOP via its normal last-byte\npath. The dummy byte is discarded; block-read callers only consume\nbuf[0..count-1].\n\nReading I2DR has likewise already armed the next byte on the\ncount \u003e I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX error path, so NACK it (TXAK) before aborting\nwith -EPROTO; otherwise the failing transfer\u0027s STOP cannot complete and\nthe bus stays held.\n\nThe atomic path regressed earlier (v3.16) and is fixed separately; this\npatch covers only the v6.13 state-machine rework.",
  "id": "GHSA-m5rq-h5xv-g5g9",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:12Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72141"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07fd9385f0d87dff4b34f355f68adf701080cb24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56ddfc18ea8f7d77747658892873eb632b2ed530"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d3240f42a667e29262aff76fdebfcdac4980626"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…