ghsa-m68p-v7vm-cp2m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:43
Modified
2022-05-02 03:43
Details

The prep_reprocess_req function in kdc/do_tgs_req.c in the cross-realm referral implementation in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7 before 1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a ticket request.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-3295"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-12-29T20:41:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The prep_reprocess_req function in kdc/do_tgs_req.c in the cross-realm referral implementation in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7 before 1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a ticket request.",
  "id": "GHSA-m68p-v7vm-cp2m",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:43:45Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:43:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3295"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37977"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023392"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/advisories/MITKRB5-SA-2009-003.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/508622/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37486"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3652"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.