ghsa-m6jw-rg4f-jw25
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-07-21 00:00
Modified
2022-08-03 00:00
Details

squashfs filesystem implementation of U-Boot versions from v2020.10-rc2 to v2022.07-rc5 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability due to a defect in the metadata reading process. Loading a specially crafted squashfs image may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition or arbitrary code execution.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-33967"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-07-20T07:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "squashfs filesystem implementation of U-Boot versions from v2020.10-rc2 to v2022.07-rc5 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability due to a defect in the metadata reading process. Loading a specially crafted squashfs image may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition or arbitrary code execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-m6jw-rg4f-jw25",
  "modified": "2022-08-03T00:00:55Z",
  "published": "2022-07-21T00:00:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-33967"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU97846460/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-June/487467.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/commit/7f7fb9937c6cb49dd35153bd6708872b390b0a44"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.denx.de/project/u-boot"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.