GHSA-M6QC-R2RX-CM2Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-24 12:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 12:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ping: Fix potentail NULL deref for /proc/net/icmp.
After commit dbca1596bbb0 ("ping: convert to RCU lookups, get rid of rwlock"), we use RCU for ping sockets, but we should use spinlock for /proc/net/icmp to avoid a potential NULL deref mentioned in the previous patch.
Let's go back to using spinlock there.
Note we can convert ping sockets to use hlist instead of hlist_nulls because we do not use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for ping sockets.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-53987"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T11:15:51Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nping: Fix potentail NULL deref for /proc/net/icmp.\n\nAfter commit dbca1596bbb0 (\"ping: convert to RCU lookups, get rid\nof rwlock\"), we use RCU for ping sockets, but we should use spinlock\nfor /proc/net/icmp to avoid a potential NULL deref mentioned in\nthe previous patch.\n\nLet\u0027s go back to using spinlock there.\n\nNote we can convert ping sockets to use hlist instead of hlist_nulls\nbecause we do not use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for ping sockets.",
"id": "GHSA-m6qc-r2rx-cm2q",
"modified": "2025-12-24T12:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-12-24T12:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53987"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/176cbb6da28f36506cc60a4bec4ab8df0c16713a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a08a32e624908890aa0a2eb442bb6a7669891a8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab5fb73ffa01072b4d8031cc05801fa1cb653bee"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…