GHSA-M76C-23W7-GCRM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:31 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:31
VLAI?
Details

Multiple stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Sage EasyPay 10.7.5.10 allow authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via multiple parameters through Unicode Transformations (Best-fit Mapping), as demonstrated by the full-width variants of the less-than sign (%EF%BC%9C) and greater-than sign (%EF%BC%9E).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-13893"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-10-18T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Sage EasyPay 10.7.5.10 allow authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via multiple parameters through Unicode Transformations (Best-fit Mapping), as demonstrated by the full-width variants of the less-than sign (%EF%BC%9C) and greater-than sign (%EF%BC%9E).",
  "id": "GHSA-m76c-23w7-gcrm",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:31:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:31:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13893"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/picar0jsu/4532a6d15e8f8d7597b7dca5136ad655"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.sage.com/en-sg/products/sage-easypay"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…