ghsa-m775-r988-g6m4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:20
Modified
2022-05-13 01:20
Severity ?
Details
An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-6485" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-02-01T14:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption.", "id": "GHSA-m775-r988-g6m4", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:20:29Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:20:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-6485" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3092" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22343" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4218-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/878159" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102912" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.