GHSA-M7PM-G64Q-7XF7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: fix driver-set TX rates on old devices

On old devices such as 7265D, rates are still encoded in version 1 format, which doesn't use the CCK/OFDM rate index (0-3/0-7) but rather their PLCP value (e.g. 10 for 1 Mbps CCK rate.)

While introducing v3 rates, I changed the driver from internally handling v1 rates and converting to v2, to internally handling v3 and converting to v1 or v2 according to the firmware. I accordingly changed the code in iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to no longer have different values for different APIs. This was correct.

However, I later reverted this part of the change, because it was reported that I had broken beacon rates, causing a FW assert/crash. This caused TX_CMD rates to be set incorrectly, potentially causing a warning when reported back from the device as having been used.

Fix this (hopefully correctly now) by handling beacon rates in the TX_CMD that's embedded in the beacon template command separately. Restore iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to return only the rate index, not PLCP value, fixing the real TX_CMD.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64176"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:59Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: fix driver-set TX rates on old devices\n\nOn old devices such as 7265D, rates are still encoded in version 1\nformat, which doesn\u0027t use the CCK/OFDM rate index (0-3/0-7) but\nrather their PLCP value (e.g. 10 for 1 Mbps CCK rate.)\n\nWhile introducing v3 rates, I changed the driver from internally\nhandling v1 rates and converting to v2, to internally handling v3\nand converting to v1 or v2 according to the firmware. I accordingly\nchanged the code in iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to no longer\nhave different values for different APIs. This was correct.\n\nHowever, I later reverted this part of the change, because it was\nreported that I had broken beacon rates, causing a FW assert/crash.\nThis caused TX_CMD rates to be set incorrectly, potentially causing\na warning when reported back from the device as having been used.\n\nFix this (hopefully correctly now) by handling beacon rates in the\nTX_CMD that\u0027s embedded in the beacon template command separately.\nRestore iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to return only the rate\nindex, not PLCP value, fixing the real TX_CMD.",
  "id": "GHSA-m7pm-g64q-7xf7",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:32:02Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T18:31:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64176"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b58a79f2cd98156856eb49e8b55db5facdd7e6d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fe92651b44fd3cfc8dcfdaad0e82885c384dada"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb84b5cbcaab3ca0f4e961d92a40ed7f3aac483b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…