GHSA-M837-G268-MMV7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-25 14:08 – Updated: 2025-07-25 14:08
VLAI?
Summary
Node-SAML SAML Authentication Bypass
Details

Node-SAML loads the assertion from the (unsigned) original response document. This is different than the parts that are verified when checking signature.

This allows an attacker to modify authentication details within a valid SAML assertion. For example, in one attack it is possible to remove any character from the SAML assertion username.

To conduct the attack an attacker would need a validly signed document from the identity provider (IdP).

In fixing this we upgraded xml-crypto to v6.1.2 and made sure to process the SAML assertions from only verified/authenticated contents. This will prevent future variants from coming up.

Severity ?
9.3 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "node-saml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "3.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.0.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@node-saml/node-saml"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.1.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-54369"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-347",
      "CWE-87"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-07-25T14:08:50Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-24T23:15:26Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Node-SAML loads the assertion from the (unsigned) original response document. This is different than the parts that are verified when checking signature. \n\nThis allows an attacker to modify authentication details within a valid SAML assertion. For example, in one attack it is possible to remove any character from the SAML assertion username.\n\nTo conduct the attack an attacker would need a validly signed document from the identity provider (IdP).\n\nIn fixing this we upgraded xml-crypto to v6.1.2 and made sure to process the SAML assertions from only verified/authenticated contents. This will prevent future variants from coming up.",
  "id": "GHSA-m837-g268-mmv7",
  "modified": "2025-07-25T14:08:50Z",
  "published": "2025-07-25T14:08:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/node-saml/node-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-m837-g268-mmv7"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-54369"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/node-saml/node-saml/commit/31ead9411ebc3e2385086fa9149b6c17732bca10"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/node-saml/node-saml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/node-saml/node-saml/releases/tag/v5.1.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Node-SAML SAML Authentication Bypass"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.