GHSA-M875-3XF6-MF78
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-30 22:58 – Updated: 2023-04-07 22:54There is a possible Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in the unpoly-rails gem that implements the Unpoly server protocol for Rails applications.
Impact
This issues affects Rails applications that operate as an upstream of a load balancer's that uses passive health checks.
The unpoly-rails gem echoes the request URL as an X-Up-Location response header. By making a request with exceedingly long URLs (paths or query string), an attacker can cause unpoly-rails to write a exceedingly large response header.
If the response header is too large to be parsed by a load balancer downstream of the Rails application, it may cause the load balancer to remove the upstream from a load balancing group. This causes that application instance to become unavailable until a configured timeout is reached or until an active healthcheck succeeds.
Patches
The fixed release 2.7.2.2+ is available via RubyGems and GitHub.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade to a fixed release, several workarounds are available:
- Configure your load balancer to use active health checks, e.g. by periodically requesting a route with a known response that indicates healthiness.
- Configure your load balancer so the maximum size of response headers is at least twice the maximum size of a URL.
- Instead of changing your server configuration you may also configure your Rails application to delete redundant
X-Up-Locationheaders set by unpoly-rails:
```ruby class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
after_action :remove_redundant_up_location_header
private
def remove_redundant_up_location_header
if request.original_url == response.headers['X-Up-Location']
response.headers.delete('X-Up-Location')
end
end
end ```
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "unpoly-rails"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-28846"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-03-30T22:58:38Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-30T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "There is a possible Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in the unpoly-rails gem that implements the [Unpoly server protocol](https://unpoly.com/up.protocol) for Rails applications.\n\n### Impact\n\nThis issues affects Rails applications that operate as an upstream of a load balancer\u0027s that uses [passive health checks](https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/load-balancer/http-health-check/#passive-health-checks).\n\nThe [unpoly-rails](https://github.com/unpoly/unpoly-rails/) gem echoes the request URL as an `X-Up-Location` response header. By making a request with exceedingly long URLs (paths or query string), an attacker can cause unpoly-rails to write a exceedingly large response header.\n\nIf the response header is too large to be parsed by a load balancer downstream of the Rails application, it may cause the load balancer to remove the upstream from a load balancing group. This causes that application instance to become unavailable until a configured timeout is reached or until an active healthcheck succeeds.\n\n\n### Patches\n\nThe fixed release 2.7.2.2+ is available via RubyGems and GitHub.\n\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf you cannot upgrade to a fixed release, several workarounds are available:\n\n- Configure your load balancer to use active health checks, e.g. by periodically requesting a route with a known response that indicates healthiness.\n- Configure your load balancer so the [maximum size of response headers](https://makandracards.com/operations/537537-nginx-proxy-buffer-tuning) is at least twice the [maximum size of a URL](https://tryhexadecimal.com/guides/http/414-request-uri-too-long).\n- Instead of changing your server configuration you may also configure your Rails application to delete redundant `X-Up-Location` headers set by unpoly-rails:\n \n ```ruby\n class ApplicationController \u003c ActionController::Base\n \n after_action :remove_redundant_up_location_header\n \n private\n \n def remove_redundant_up_location_header\n if request.original_url == response.headers[\u0027X-Up-Location\u0027]\n response.headers.delete(\u0027X-Up-Location\u0027)\n end\n end\n \n end\n ```",
"id": "GHSA-m875-3xf6-mf78",
"modified": "2023-04-07T22:54:15Z",
"published": "2023-03-30T22:58:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/unpoly/unpoly-rails/security/advisories/GHSA-m875-3xf6-mf78"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28846"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/unpoly/unpoly-rails/commit/cd9ad0007daceeb3b2354fdcab4f88350427bf16"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/load-balancer/http-health-check/#passive-health-checks"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/unpoly-rails/CVE-2023-28846.yml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/unpoly/unpoly-rails"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://makandracards.com/operations/537537-nginx-proxy-buffer-tuning"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tryhexadecimal.com/guides/http/414-request-uri-too-long"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://unpoly.com/up.protocol"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "unpoly-rails Denial of Service vulnerability"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.