github - ghsa-m896-wg3p-7ffv

ghsa-m896-wg3p-7ffv

Vulnerability from github

Published

2022-05-17 05:28

Modified

2022-05-17 05:28

Details

** DISPUTED ** Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment.

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-5094"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-06-16T21:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED ** Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment.",
  "id": "GHSA-m896-wg3p-7ffv",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:28:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:28:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5094"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

cve-2011-5094

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2012-06-16 21:00

Modified

2024-09-16 21:56

Severity ?

Summary

Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment

References

▼	URL	Tags
	http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST
	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html	mailing-list, x_refsource_MLIST

Impacted products

Vendor

Product

Version

▼

n/a

Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T00:23:40.220Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2012-06-16T21:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"
        },
        {
          "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"
        }
      ],
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2011-5094",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "** DISPUTED ** Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.x, with certain settings of the SSL_ENABLE_RENEGOTIATION option, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1473.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2011-5094",
    "datePublished": "2012-06-16T21:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-06-16T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T21:56:51.299Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.

Action not permitted