ghsa-m8gw-x5jx-r3vm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:15
Modified
2022-04-30 18:15
Severity ?
Details
crypto/rsa/rsa_gen.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.6 mishandles C bitwise-shift operations that exceed the size of an expression, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging improper RSA key generation on 64-bit HP-UX platforms.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2000-1254" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-05-05T01:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "crypto/rsa/rsa_gen.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.6 mishandles C bitwise-shift operations that exceed the size of an expression, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging improper RSA key generation on 64-bit HP-UX platforms.", "id": "GHSA-m8gw-x5jx-r3vm", "modified": "2022-04-30T18:15:13Z", "published": "2022-04-30T18:15:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2000-1254" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=db82b8f9bd432a59aea8e1014694e15fc457c2bb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=openssl-users\u0026m=95961024500509" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/04/17" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90109" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035750" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.