GHSA-M8RH-P4V3-9RR7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:50 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:50
VLAI?
Details
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in mobiquo/smartbanner/welcome.php in the Tapatalk (com.tapatalk.wbb4) plugin 1.x before 1.1.2 for Woltlab Burning Board 4.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) app_android_id or (2) app_kindle_url parameter.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-8869"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-01-15T15:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in mobiquo/smartbanner/welcome.php in the Tapatalk (com.tapatalk.wbb4) plugin 1.x before 1.1.2 for Woltlab Burning Board 4.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) app_android_id or (2) app_kindle_url parameter.",
"id": "GHSA-m8rh-p4v3-9rr7",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:50:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:50:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8869"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.tapatalk.com/threads/tapatalk-for-woltlab-plugin-release-announcement-and-changelog.19540"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.redteam-pentesting.de/en/advisories/rt-sa-2014-015/-cross-site-scripting-in-tapatalk-plugin-for-woltlab-burning-board-4-0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Jan/31"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/534449/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71997"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…