GHSA-M8XM-PGRJ-WHRP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-08-27 06:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/zcrypt: Improve EP11 CPRB domain handling with ASN.1 parsing
The zcrypt_msgtype6_send_ep11_cprb() function uses fragile struct overlays to access and modify the domain field in the EP11 CPRB payload, creating maintainability and security concerns: 1. Struct overlay approach (pld_hdr) assumes fixed payload structure and doesn't validate the actual ASN.1 encoding. 2. Complex length format detection logic is error-prone and doesn't properly validate bounds at each parsing step. 3. Direct struct member access bypasses proper ASN.1 validation.
Fix by replacing struct overlays with explicit ASN.1 parsing that validates each field (payload tag/length, function tag/length/value, optional domain tag/length/value) with proper bounds checking at every step. Add asn1_int_encode() helper function to safely write integer values with correct endianness conversion. This makes the code consistent with the validation pattern introduced with the rework of the xcrb_msg_to_type6_ep11cprb_msgx() function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-80544"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-26T15:17:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/zcrypt: Improve EP11 CPRB domain handling with ASN.1 parsing\n\nThe zcrypt_msgtype6_send_ep11_cprb() function uses fragile struct\noverlays to access and modify the domain field in the EP11 CPRB\npayload, creating maintainability and security concerns:\n1. Struct overlay approach (pld_hdr) assumes fixed payload structure\n and doesn\u0027t validate the actual ASN.1 encoding.\n2. Complex length format detection logic is error-prone and doesn\u0027t\n properly validate bounds at each parsing step.\n3. Direct struct member access bypasses proper ASN.1 validation.\n\nFix by replacing struct overlays with explicit ASN.1 parsing that\nvalidates each field (payload tag/length, function tag/length/value,\noptional domain tag/length/value) with proper bounds checking at every\nstep. Add asn1_int_encode() helper function to safely write integer\nvalues with correct endianness conversion. This makes the code\nconsistent with the validation pattern introduced with the rework of\nthe xcrb_msg_to_type6_ep11cprb_msgx() function.",
"id": "GHSA-m8xm-pgrj-whrp",
"modified": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
"published": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80544"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0864a163783bff109b548266921829ea794edc93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db21b2cf6dd0af5ffd08931e0a9fcda5a0473220"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.