GHSA-MCF6-FPVV-XXR4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 15:31 – Updated: 2025-10-29 18:30
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()

The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

 Call Trace:
  lockdep_rcu_suspicious
  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply
  perf_iterate_ctx
  perf_event_exec
  begin_new_exec
  ? load_elf_phdrs
  load_elf_binary
  ? lock_acquire
  ? find_held_lock
  ? bprm_execve
  bprm_execve
  do_execveat_common.isra.0
  __x64_sys_execve
  do_syscall_64
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

This protection was previously present but was removed in commit bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling"). Add back the necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().

[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]

Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21889"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T15:15:56Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()\n\nThe perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but\ncurrently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings\nwhen running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:\n\n\tWARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n\tkernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!\n\n\t Call Trace:\n\t  lockdep_rcu_suspicious\n\t  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply\n\t  perf_iterate_ctx\n\t  perf_event_exec\n\t  begin_new_exec\n\t  ? load_elf_phdrs\n\t  load_elf_binary\n\t  ? lock_acquire\n\t  ? find_held_lock\n\t  ? bprm_execve\n\t  bprm_execve\n\t  do_execveat_common.isra.0\n\t  __x64_sys_execve\n\t  do_syscall_64\n\t  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe\n\nThis protection was previously present but was removed in commit\nbd2756811766 (\"perf: Rewrite core context handling\"). Add back the\nnecessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around\nperf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().\n\n[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]",
  "id": "GHSA-mcf6-fpvv-xxr4",
  "modified": "2025-10-29T18:30:28Z",
  "published": "2025-03-27T15:31:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21889"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0fe8813baf4b2e865d3b2c735ce1a15b86002c74"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2475ccad6120546ea45dbcd6cd1f74dc565ef6b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd536566dda9a551fc2a2acfab5313a5bb13ed02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f390c2eea571945f357a2d3b9fcb1c015767132e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.