GHSA-MCVF-JXCW-VJ73
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-29 20:36 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:39
VLAI
Summary
CKAN has CSRF exemption primed by anonymous requests
Details
Views can be marked as exempt from CSRF protection
Access to the views via tokens or unauthenticated requests marked the endpoint as not requiring CSRF protection.
The marking was a member variable in flask-wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect(), which was stored as a module level variable in the flask_app middleware. Thsi API was never intended for request level changes, it is primarily a decorator for static configuration.
An unauthenticated request could hit a protected endpoint, exempting it from CSRF protection for the life of the particular server process. (e.g. one worker of uwsgi).
This could be leveraged with XSS to perform actions using other user's credentials.
References
- Vulnerability report by @Shirshaw64p (original reporter)
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "ckan"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.10.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.10.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.11.4"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "ckan"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.11.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41255"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-29T20:36:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T19:17:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Views can be marked as exempt from CSRF protection \n\nAccess to the views via tokens or unauthenticated requests marked the endpoint as not requiring CSRF protection. \n\nThe marking was a member variable in flask-wtf.csrf.CSRFProtect(), which was stored as a module level variable in the flask_app middleware. Thsi API was never intended for request level changes, it is primarily a decorator for static configuration. \n\nAn unauthenticated request could hit a protected endpoint, exempting it from CSRF protection for the life of the particular server process. (e.g. one worker of uwsgi).\n\nThis could be leveraged with XSS to perform actions using other user\u0027s credentials.\n\n### References\n\n* [Vulnerability report](https://github.com/Shirshaw64p/security-advisories/tree/main/CVE-2026-41255) by @Shirshaw64p (original reporter)",
"id": "GHSA-mcvf-jxcw-vj73",
"modified": "2026-05-14T20:39:41Z",
"published": "2026-04-29T20:36:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ckan/ckan/security/advisories/GHSA-mcvf-jxcw-vj73"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41255"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.ckan.org/en/2.10/changelog.html#v-2-10-10-2026-04-29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.ckan.org/en/2.11/changelog.html#v-2-11-5-2026-04-29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Shirshaw64p/security-advisories/tree/main/CVE-2026-41255"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ckan/ckan"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CKAN has CSRF exemption primed by anonymous requests"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…