ghsa-mcvj-6jjv-7hw9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-28 15:30
Modified
2024-04-28 15:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/slab_common: fix possible double free of kmem_cache

When doing slub_debug test, kfence's 'test_memcache_typesafe_by_rcu' kunit test case cause a use-after-free error:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in kobject_del+0x14/0x30 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888007679090 by task kunit_try_catch/261

CPU: 1 PID: 261 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G B N 6.0.0-rc5-next-20220916 #17 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x87/0x2a5 print_report+0x103/0x1ed kasan_report+0xb7/0x140 kobject_del+0x14/0x30 kmem_cache_destroy+0x130/0x170 test_exit+0x1a/0x30 kunit_try_run_case+0xad/0xc0 kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x26/0x50 kthread+0x17b/0x1b0

The cause is inside kmem_cache_destroy():

kmem_cache_destroy acquire lock/mutex shutdown_cache schedule_work(kmem_cache_release) (if RCU flag set) release lock/mutex kmem_cache_release (if RCU flag not set)

In some certain timing, the scheduled work could be run before the next RCU flag checking, which can then get a wrong value and lead to double kmem_cache_release().

Fix it by caching the RCU flag inside protected area, just like 'refcnt'

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-48649"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-28T13:15:07Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/slab_common: fix possible double free of kmem_cache\n\nWhen doing slub_debug test, kfence\u0027s \u0027test_memcache_typesafe_by_rcu\u0027\nkunit test case cause a use-after-free error:\n\n  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in kobject_del+0x14/0x30\n  Read of size 8 at addr ffff888007679090 by task kunit_try_catch/261\n\n  CPU: 1 PID: 261 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B            N 6.0.0-rc5-next-20220916 #17\n  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n  Call Trace:\n   \u003cTASK\u003e\n   dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48\n   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x87/0x2a5\n   print_report+0x103/0x1ed\n   kasan_report+0xb7/0x140\n   kobject_del+0x14/0x30\n   kmem_cache_destroy+0x130/0x170\n   test_exit+0x1a/0x30\n   kunit_try_run_case+0xad/0xc0\n   kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x26/0x50\n   kthread+0x17b/0x1b0\n   \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nThe cause is inside kmem_cache_destroy():\n\nkmem_cache_destroy\n    acquire lock/mutex\n    shutdown_cache\n        schedule_work(kmem_cache_release) (if RCU flag set)\n    release lock/mutex\n    kmem_cache_release (if RCU flag not set)\n\nIn some certain timing, the scheduled work could be run before\nthe next RCU flag checking, which can then get a wrong value\nand lead to double kmem_cache_release().\n\nFix it by caching the RCU flag inside protected area, just like \u0027refcnt\u0027",
  "id": "GHSA-mcvj-6jjv-7hw9",
  "modified": "2024-04-28T15:30:30Z",
  "published": "2024-04-28T15:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48649"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c673c6ceac53fb2e631c9fbbd79957099a08927f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d71608a877362becdc94191f190902fac1e64d35"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.