ghsa-mf23-wm84-g9x3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-01-14 21:31
Modified
2025-01-14 21:31
Details

IPv4-in-IPv6 and IPv6-in-IPv6 tunneling (RFC 2473) do not require the validation or verification of the source of a network packet, allowing an attacker to spoof and route arbitrary traffic via an exposed network interface. This is a similar issue to CVE-2020-10136.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2025-23018",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-940",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2025-01-14T20:15:32Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "IPv4-in-IPv6 and IPv6-in-IPv6 tunneling (RFC 2473) do not require the validation or verification of the source of a network packet, allowing an attacker to spoof and route arbitrary traffic via an exposed network interface. This is a similar issue to CVE-2020-10136.",
   id: "GHSA-mf23-wm84-g9x3",
   modified: "2025-01-14T21:31:48Z",
   published: "2025-01-14T21:31:48Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23018",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2473",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://papers.mathyvanhoef.com/usenix2025-tunnels.pdf",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.top10vpn.com/research/tunneling-protocol-vulnerability",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.