GHSA-MG9W-4H7R-F7P3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:36 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:34
VLAI?
Details
tools/tiffcp.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer underflow and heap-based buffer under-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TIFF image, related to "READ of size 78490" and libtiff/tif_unix.c:115:23.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10268"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-191"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-24T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "tools/tiffcp.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer underflow and heap-based buffer under-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TIFF image, related to \"READ of size 78490\" and libtiff/tif_unix.c:115:23.",
"id": "GHSA-mg9w-4h7r-f7p3",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:34:47Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:36:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10268"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/5397a417e61258c69209904e652a1f409ec3b9df"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/01/01/libtiff-multiple-heap-based-buffer-overflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201709-27"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3602-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97202"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…