GHSA-MGQ6-H57W-6G82
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:02 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:59
VLAI?
Details
The overlayfs implementation in the Linux kernel through 4.5.2 does not properly maintain POSIX ACL xattr data, which allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging a group-writable setgid directory.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-1575"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-269"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-05-02T10:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The overlayfs implementation in the Linux kernel through 4.5.2 does not properly maintain POSIX ACL xattr data, which allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging a group-writable setgid directory.",
"id": "GHSA-mgq6-h57w-6g82",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:59:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:02:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-1575"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://launchpad.net/bugs/1534961"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e9f57ebcba563e0cd532926cab83c92bb4d79360"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2016/CVE-2016-1575.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.halfdog.net/Security/2016/UserNamespaceOverlayfsXattrSetgidPrivilegeEscalation"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/02/24/7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/18/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…