ghsa-mgr8-2fmh-mcqw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:57
Modified
2022-05-14 03:57
Severity ?
Details
Incorrect processing of responses to If-None-Modified HTTP conditional requests in Squid HTTP Proxy 3.1.10 through 3.1.23, 3.2.0.3 through 3.5.22, and 4.0.1 through 4.0.16 leads to client-specific Cookie data being leaked to other clients. Attack requests can easily be crafted by a client to probe a cache for this information.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-10002" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-01-27T17:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Incorrect processing of responses to If-None-Modified HTTP conditional requests in Squid HTTP Proxy 3.1.10 through 3.1.23, 3.2.0.3 through 3.5.22, and 4.0.1 through 4.0.16 leads to client-specific Cookie data being leaked to other clients. Attack requests can easily be crafted by a client to probe a cache for this information.", "id": "GHSA-mgr8-2fmh-mcqw", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:57:56Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:57:56Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10002" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0182.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0183.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3745" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/12/18/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94953" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037513" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_11.txt" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.