ghsa-mh8h-6q9x-8j58
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:39
Modified
2022-05-01 23:39
Details
gcc 4.3.x does not generate a cld instruction while compiling functions used for string manipulation such as memcpy and memmove on x86 and i386, which can prevent the direction flag (DF) from being reset in violation of ABI conventions and cause data to be copied in the wrong direction during signal handling in the Linux kernel, which might allow context-dependent attackers to trigger memory corruption. NOTE: this issue was originally reported for CPU consumption in SBCL.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-1367" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-03-17T23:44:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "gcc 4.3.x does not generate a cld instruction while compiling functions used for string manipulation such as memcpy and memmove on x86 and i386, which can prevent the direction flag (DF) from being reset in violation of ABI conventions and cause data to be copied in the wrong direction during signal handling in the Linux kernel, which might allow context-dependent attackers to trigger memory corruption. NOTE: this issue was originally reported for CPU consumption in SBCL.", "id": "GHSA-mh8h-6q9x-8j58", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:39:31Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:39:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1367" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437312" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41340" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11108" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469058" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00417.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00428.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00432.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00499.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e40cd10ccff3d9fbffd57b93780bee4b7b9bff51" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-06/msg00006.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-07/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-07/msg00002.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2008/000023.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/5/207" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lwn.net/Articles/272048/#Comments" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=git-commits-head\u0026m=120492000901739\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0508.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30110" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30116" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30818" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30850" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30890" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30962" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31246" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0211.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2008-0233.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29084" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2222/references" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.