GHSA-MHW6-P52X-6VXV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-21 15:34 – Updated: 2026-06-19 15:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler

t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler() uses the modem-supplied port_count field as a loop bound over port_msg->data[] without checking that the message buffer contains sufficient data. A modem sending port_count=65535 in a 12-byte buffer triggers a slab-out-of-bounds read of up to 262140 bytes.

Add a sizeof(*port_msg) check before accessing the port message header fields to guard against undersized messages.

Add a struct_size() check after extracting port_count and before the loop.

In t7xx_parse_host_rt_data(), guard the rt_feature header read with a remaining-buffer check before accessing data_len, validate feat_data_len against the actual remaining buffer to prevent OOB reads and signed integer overflow on offset.

Pass msg_len from both call sites: skb->len at the DPMAIF path after skb_pull(), and the validated feat_data_len at the handshake path.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43495"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-125"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-21T13:16:18Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler\n\nt7xx_port_enum_msg_handler() uses the modem-supplied port_count field as\na loop bound over port_msg-\u003edata[] without checking that the message buffer\ncontains sufficient data. A modem sending port_count=65535 in a 12-byte\nbuffer triggers a slab-out-of-bounds read of up to 262140 bytes.\n\nAdd a sizeof(*port_msg) check before accessing the port message header\nfields to guard against undersized messages.\n\nAdd a struct_size() check after extracting port_count and before the loop.\n\nIn t7xx_parse_host_rt_data(), guard the rt_feature header read with a\nremaining-buffer check before accessing data_len, validate feat_data_len\nagainst the actual remaining buffer to prevent OOB reads and signed\ninteger overflow on offset.\n\nPass msg_len from both call sites: skb-\u003elen at the DPMAIF path after\nskb_pull(), and the validated feat_data_len at the handshake path.",
  "id": "GHSA-mhw6-p52x-6vxv",
  "modified": "2026-06-19T15:33:10Z",
  "published": "2026-05-21T15:34:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43495"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e7c074cfcd9bd93765505f9eb8b42f03ed2a744"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b56d7903ab804481f5233a259d5f341e9fd513c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/307c5d0f36a5c74042217136da5bfbd9f7504650"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9855e063e063158cc5bded576382599dc3133202"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd4f4c93c1488d7100b9964f2da4c8b3c29652f1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f94450ce5053b36002995b72d1fa1db3bb08c5bf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/18/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…