ghsa-mj2q-jjfm-w2rq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:33
Modified
2022-05-17 01:33
Details

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0 does not properly cache EJB invocations by remote-naming, which allows remote attackers to hijack sessions by using a remoting client.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-4128"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-08-16T16:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0 does not properly cache EJB invocations by remote-naming, which allows remote attackers to hijack sessions by using a remoting client.",
  "id": "GHSA-mj2q-jjfm-w2rq",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:33:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:33:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4128"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984795"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/86386"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/96217"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1151.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1152.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1437.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54508"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028898"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.