GHSA-MJJG-JGRJ-9453
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-11 21:32 – Updated: 2025-02-13 18:32
VLAI?
Details
A security issue in Sitevision version 10.3.1 and older allows a remote attacker, in certain (non-default) scenarios, to gain access to the private keys used for signing SAML Authn requests. The underlying issue is a Java keystore that may become accessible and downloadable via WebDAV. This keystore is protected with a low-complexity, auto-generated password.
Severity ?
5.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-35202"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-532"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-11T19:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A security issue in Sitevision version 10.3.1 and older allows a remote attacker, in certain (non-default) scenarios, to gain access to the private keys used for signing SAML Authn requests. The underlying issue is a Java keystore that may become accessible and downloadable via WebDAV. This keystore is protected with a low-complexity, auto-generated password.",
"id": "GHSA-mjjg-jgrj-9453",
"modified": "2025-02-13T18:32:31Z",
"published": "2025-02-11T21:32:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35202"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://developer.sitevision.se/archives/release-notes/release-notes/2022-05-06-release-notes-sitevision-10.3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.shelltrail.com/research/how-auto-generated-passwords-in-sitevision-leads-to-signing-key-leakage-cve-2022-35202"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…