GHSA-MJRV-32HR-4PV5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:48 – Updated: 2025-01-14 21:31
VLAI?
Details

A design flaw in SYNO.API.Encryption in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.1.3-15152 allows remote attackers to bypass the encryption protection mechanism via the crafted version parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-9553"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-07-24T20:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A design flaw in SYNO.API.Encryption in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.1.3-15152 allows remote attackers to bypass the encryption protection mechanism via the crafted version parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-mjrv-32hr-4pv5",
  "modified": "2025-01-14T21:31:36Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:48:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9553"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.2-sec.com/2017/06/2-secs-expert-team-uncovers-new-vulnerability-popular-synology-nas-device"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.synology.com/en-global/support/security/Synology_SA_17_29_DSM"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…